Tenn Canna Publishing
Reefer Madness 2.0: Science vs. Policy — When the Healers Speak and the Enforcers Stall
How HHS and FDA medical evaluations clash with DEA inaction — a modern battle of words in federal cannabis policy.
Read the series from the beginning: Reefer Madness 2.0: The War of Words Begins
HHS / FDA Scientific Findings
On August 29, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) submitted a scientific evaluation recommending that cannabis be rescheduled to Schedule III. The report stated:
“HHS … found that marijuana has a potential for abuse less than the drugs or other substances in Schedules I and II; that marijuana has a currently accepted medical use; and that the abuse of marijuana may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence.”
— HHS Scientific Evaluation Letter to DEA, 2023
This was a clear, evidence-based recommendation supporting medical use. Modern research and decades of state legalization programs confirm these findings.
DEA / Enforcement Reality
Despite the HHS recommendations, the DEA continues to maintain that cannabis has “no currently accepted medical use,” creating a direct conflict between science and policy:
“Some examples of Schedule I drugs are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis)… Schedule I drugs … are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.”
— DEA Drug Scheduling, 2025
Recent reporting highlights the ongoing stall:
“The Drug Enforcement Administration said … the marijuana rescheduling process remains stalled … despite the head of agency’s prior commitment to senators that he would prioritize the issue if confirmed for the role.”
— Marijuana Moment, 2025
“Marijuana has been ‘legalized’ and/or ‘decriminalized’ at the state level … as of January 2024 …”
— DEA 2025 National Drug Review
War of Words: Highlighting Contradictions
- HHS: “Currently accepted medical use.”
DEA: “No accepted medical use.” - HHS: “Abuse potential is lower than Schedule I/II drugs.”
DEA: “High potential for abuse.” - HHS: “Rescheduling recommended.”
DEA: “Process remains stalled.”
By letting their own words collide, the contradictions are clear — the science is settled, yet the gatekeepers remain in stasis.
Actionable Angle for Readers
- Track official HHS/FDA reports vs. DEA statements.
- Compare federal contradictions with real-world state legalization outcomes.
- Document and share clear “War of Words” examples to expose the gap between evidence and enforcement.
Next in the Series
🧭 Explore Tennessee Cannabiz Related Posts
🕵️♂️ The Great Hemp Conspiracy Series: Cannabis in the Industrial Age
🌎 Cannabis 2025: Legalization, Innovation, and the Global Future
🏠 Home
© Tenn Canna Publishing — Reefer Madness 2.0 Series | Author: Tenn Canna Publishing

Comments
Post a Comment