Skip to main content

Border Economics: How Tennessee's Neighbors Are Profiting from Legal Cannabis While Tennessee Pays to Enforce Prohibition

 


Border Economics: How Tennessee's Neighbors Are Profiting from Legal Cannabis While Tennessee Pays to Enforce Prohibition

A Comparative Analysis of Cannabis Tax Revenue in Surrounding States

While Illinois collected nearly $500 million in cannabis tax revenue in 2024, Tennessee spent millions arresting and incarcerating people for marijuana possession. Both states have similar populations. One is funding schools and community programs; the other is funding jails.

This is the story of an economic choice — and what Tennessee is giving up by maintaining prohibition while its neighbors capitalize on legalization.

The Numbers: What Tennessee's Neighbors Are Earning

Illinois: The Border State Boom

Just across Tennessee's northwestern border, Illinois has built one of the nation's most successful cannabis markets since legalizing recreational use in 2020.

2024 Performance:

  • Total cannabis sales: $2 billion
  • Tax revenue generated: nearly $500 million
  • Products sold: over 56.3 million items

Since legalization, Illinois has generated more than $2 billion in cumulative cannabis tax revenue, funding education, community reinvestment, substance abuse treatment, and veterans’ services.

Missouri: The Show-Me State Shows Results

Missouri shares Tennessee’s demographics and political leanings — but chose a different path.

2024 Performance:

  • Total marijuana sales: $1.46 billion
  • Total tax revenue: $244.93 million
  • Employment: Over 21,800 cannabis industry jobs

Missouri exceeded four-year projections in just two years. Revenue is split between veterans’ services, substance abuse prevention, and the public defender system.

Arkansas: Medical Market, Real Revenue

Even without recreational legalization, Arkansas demonstrates the economic potential of cannabis reform.

2024 Performance:

  • Total medical sales: $275.9 million
  • State tax revenue: $31+ million
  • Active patients: ~109,000

Most revenue funds cancer research through the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Virginia: The Complicated Case

Virginia legalized possession but not retail sales, creating a $2.4 billion black market with minimal tax revenue.

Analysts estimate a regulated adult-use market could generate hundreds of millions annually — revenue currently lost to illegal markets.

Tennessee's Enforcement Costs: The Other Side of the Ledger

Tennessee recorded more than 11,000 marijuana possession arrests in 2024.

  • Up to one year in jail for first-time possession
  • 37% of all drug arrests were marijuana-related
  • Black Tennesseans arrested 3.2× more often than white residents

These arrests come with direct costs (policing, courts, incarceration) and indirect costs (lost productivity, long-term economic harm).

The Opportunity Cost: What Could Tennessee Buy?

Conservative estimates suggest legalization could generate $130–150 million annually.

That could fund:

  • Tuition for 12,500 community college students
  • Highway repairs and infrastructure
  • Rural healthcare expansion
  • Addiction treatment programs
  • Veterans’ services

The Geographic Reality: Tennessee as an Island

Six of Tennessee’s eight border states have comprehensive medical cannabis laws. One — Missouri — has full recreational legalization.

Tennessee is now a regional outlier.

Cross-Border Commerce: Where Do Tennesseans Go?

  • Illinois: 19% of cannabis sales from out-of-state consumers
  • Missouri: Border dispensaries thriving
  • Medical states: Temporary residency loopholes

Tennesseans already spend cannabis dollars — just not at home.

The Economic Multiplier Effect

Legal cannabis markets generate:

  • Tens of thousands of jobs
  • Ancillary business growth
  • Commercial real estate development
  • Tourism spending

Comparing Tax Structures: Lessons for Tennessee

  • Illinois: High tax, high revenue, some market leakage
  • Missouri: Moderate tax, strong growth
  • Arkansas: Medical-only, steady revenue

A moderate tax model (10–15%) could optimize revenue while minimizing black market activity.

The Social Equity Argument

Neighboring states have paired legalization with expungement and reinvestment.

  • Illinois reinvests 30% of revenue in impacted communities
  • Missouri expunged 130,000 nonviolent convictions

Tennessee continues to enforce laws with disproportionate racial impact.

What the Data Shows: Legalization Works

  • Fewer arrests
  • Stable youth usage
  • Improved public safety
  • Billions in economic activity

Conclusion: The Choice Before Tennessee

Option A: Prohibition — arrests, costs, zero revenue.

Option B: Regulation — revenue, jobs, safety, reform.

The border economics are simple:
One side of the line funds schools. The other side funds jails.


This article is for educational purposes only and reflects publicly available data as of 2025.

Related Reading

Comments

People's Choice

A Thank You Letter To President Trump for Opening the Door to Cannabis Research

  Trump's Cannabis From Schedule I to Schedule III Move Dear President Trump, I want to extend a sincere and enthusiastic thank you for your leadership in considering and moving forward with the rescheduling of marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance — a step that has already begun to reshape the national conversation around cannabis, research, and medical science. Your public remarks acknowledging that many people want this reclassification because it “leads to tremendous amounts of research that can’t be done unless you reclassify” reflect a willingness to look beyond old stigmas and recognize the potential for science and medicine to understand cannabis more fully. This shift — which would acknowledge cannabis as a substance with accepted medical use and a lower potential for abuse relative to Schedule I drugs — marks one of the most significant federal policy considerations in decades. By opening the door to research, innovation, an...

Key differences Between Schedule I and Schedule III — What Rescheduling Marijuana Could Mean

  Key differences Between Schedule I and Schedule III — What Rescheduling Marijuana Could Mean Schedule I vs Schedule III Under the U.S. Controlled Substances Act (CSA), drugs are classified into schedules based on their accepted medical use, potential for abuse, and risk of dependence. Two key schedules in this context are Schedule I and Schedule III: Schedule I : Drugs with no currently accepted medical use in the U.S., a high potential for abuse , and potentially severe psychological or physical dependence. Examples include heroin, LSD, and currently, marijuana (cannabis). Schedule III : Drugs with accepted medical use , moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence, and a lower abuse risk compared to Schedules I or II. Examples include ketamine, anabolic steroids, testosterone, and certain codeine combinations (like Tylenol with codeine). Rescheduling marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III would formally recognize its medical benefits...

Free the Green: A Letter to President Donald J. Trump

  🇺🇸 Free the Green: A Letter to President Donald J. Trump An Open Plea from the American People & the Cannabis Family Legalize It President Trump, It’s time to Free the Green — to remove marijuana from the federal Schedule I classification, where it has been trapped since the Nixon era. A Law Without a Vote Few Americans realize that marijuana’s placement as a Schedule I drug — supposedly with “no medical value and a high potential for abuse” — was never voted on by Congress . It was assigned there in 1970 under the Controlled Substances Act by executive direction, intended as a temporary classification until a scientific commission could study the plant and make recommendations. That commission, known as the Shafer Commission , did complete its work — and in 1972, it recommended that marijuana should not be criminalized and should be removed from Schedule I entirely. The findings were ignored. Politics won. Science lost. And for over fifty years, that mi...

What Is Nerolidol?

  Because of its sedative qualities, nerolidol-rich strains are often favored for evening use or for relaxation. What Is Nerolidol? Nerolidol is a naturally occurring sesquiterpene found in many plants. It has a distinctive aroma described as woody, floral, and slightly citrusy, often reminiscent of fresh ginger, jasmine, or bark. This terpene is known for its calming, sedative qualities and is commonly used in perfumes, cosmetics, and traditional herbal medicines. Nerolidol in Cannabis In cannabis, nerolidol contributes a subtle, complex aroma that blends woodsy and floral notes. It’s less common than some other terpenes but plays an important role in the overall scent and effect profile of certain strains. Strains high in nerolidol tend to be: Woody and floral Earthy with a touch of citrus Smooth and mellow Nerolidol itself does not produce intoxication but interacts with cannabinoids like THC and CBD to shape the overall experience. Effects Commo...

What Is α-Bisabolol?

  α-Bisabolol-rich cannabis products are often preferred by those seeking gentle relaxation or relief from irritation and inflammation. What Is α-Bisabolol? α-Bisabolol is a naturally occurring terpene alcohol — one of the aromatic compounds found in many plants. It is best known for its soft, floral aroma and its calming, soothing properties, often associated with chamomile . Outside of cannabis, α-Bisabolol is widely found in: German chamomile Candeia tree Various medicinal herbs Skincare and cosmetic formulations Its gentle, slightly sweet scent has long been associated with calming effects and skin-soothing benefits. α-Bisabolol in Cannabis In cannabis, α-Bisabolol is a less common but highly valued terpene. When present in noticeable amounts, it contributes a smooth, floral aroma that can soften harsher terpene profiles. Cannabis strains containing α-Bisabolol often have aromas described as: Floral and chamomile-like Lightly sweet ...