Skip to main content

Tennessee Lawmakers Revisit Marijuana Policy as Federal Shift Sparks New Debate

 

Marijuana policy returns to the Tennessee General Assembly as bipartisan proposals advance during the current session.

Tennessee Lawmakers Revisit Marijuana Policy as Federal Shift Sparks New Debate

Marijuana policy is once again under discussion at the Tennessee State Capitol, as lawmakers from both parties revisit long-standing restrictions following a significant shift in federal cannabis classification.

The renewed debate comes as federal officials move to reclassify marijuana — a change that could influence how states approach reform. While Tennessee remains one of the more restrictive states on cannabis, several proposals introduced this session suggest a growing willingness to examine alternatives.

Freedom to Farm Act Would Allow Limited Home Cultivation

State Representative Antonio Parkinson has introduced the Freedom to Farm Act, legislation that would allow limited home cultivation of marijuana for personal use.

Under the bill, one adult per household would be permitted to grow up to 15 marijuana plants, provided the plants remain on the property and are not sold, traded, or otherwise distributed.

“It is whatever their personal uses. We don't want to know and we don't. The government does not need to know.”

Parkinson emphasized that the proposal is narrowly tailored. Any marijuana removed from the property or exchanged in any form would subject the individual to existing criminal penalties under Tennessee law.

“It is not to be sold, is not to be bartered. It is not to be taken off their property. If it's taken off that property or if you're caught selling it, then you will be subject to all of the existing criminal marijuana laws.”

Senate Proposal Calls for Medical Marijuana Study

In the Senate, Republican Senator Ferrell Haile of Gallatin has introduced legislation directing the Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (TACIR) to conduct a formal study on how a medical marijuana program could be implemented in the state.

The proposal would not legalize medical marijuana but would instead examine regulatory models, potential impacts, and how similar programs operate in other states.

Senator Mark Pody said the federal reclassification could have benefits beyond healthcare, including implications for criminal justice reform.

“I think it’s going to help us not only with the health but those that have been incarcerated.”

The TACIR study bill is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where lawmakers are expected to continue weighing the benefits and risks of expanded marijuana access.

A Cautious but Notable Shift

While no major legalization measures are imminent, the presence of bipartisan proposals reflects a subtle but meaningful shift in tone at the Capitol. As federal policy evolves, Tennessee lawmakers continue to assess how — or if — state law should change.

For now, Tennessee’s cannabis future remains uncertain, but the conversation is clearly moving forward.

Comments

People's Choice

A Thank You Letter To President Trump for Opening the Door to Cannabis Research

  Trump's Cannabis From Schedule I to Schedule III Move Dear President Trump, I want to extend a sincere and enthusiastic thank you for your leadership in considering and moving forward with the rescheduling of marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance — a step that has already begun to reshape the national conversation around cannabis, research, and medical science. Your public remarks acknowledging that many people want this reclassification because it “leads to tremendous amounts of research that can’t be done unless you reclassify” reflect a willingness to look beyond old stigmas and recognize the potential for science and medicine to understand cannabis more fully. This shift — which would acknowledge cannabis as a substance with accepted medical use and a lower potential for abuse relative to Schedule I drugs — marks one of the most significant federal policy considerations in decades. By opening the door to research, innovation, an...

What Is Nerolidol?

  Because of its sedative qualities, nerolidol-rich strains are often favored for evening use or for relaxation. What Is Nerolidol? Nerolidol is a naturally occurring sesquiterpene found in many plants. It has a distinctive aroma described as woody, floral, and slightly citrusy, often reminiscent of fresh ginger, jasmine, or bark. This terpene is known for its calming, sedative qualities and is commonly used in perfumes, cosmetics, and traditional herbal medicines. Nerolidol in Cannabis In cannabis, nerolidol contributes a subtle, complex aroma that blends woodsy and floral notes. It’s less common than some other terpenes but plays an important role in the overall scent and effect profile of certain strains. Strains high in nerolidol tend to be: Woody and floral Earthy with a touch of citrus Smooth and mellow Nerolidol itself does not produce intoxication but interacts with cannabinoids like THC and CBD to shape the overall experience. Effects Commo...

The Cannabis Beverage Revolution: How THC Drinks Are Disrupting Big Alcohol (And Why Tennessee Shut Them Down)

THC-infused beverages are rapidly replacing alcohol for many consumers—triggering a coordinated backlash from the alcohol industry  that culminated in Tennessee’s 2025 hemp crackdown. The Cannabis Beverage Revolution: How THC Drinks Are Disrupting Big Alcohol (And Why Tennessee Shut Them Down) A Deep Dive Into the Fastest-Growing Segment of the Cannabis Industry—And the Billion-Dollar Threat That Triggered Tennessee's Crackdown Jump to: Market Explosion Alcohol Industry Threat Big Alcohol's Response Tennessee's Response Product Reality Health Comparison Market Reality Federal Complication Tennessee's Position The Future Conclusion When Tennessee transferred hemp regulation to the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission on January 1, 2026, most people assumed it was about public safety or protecting children. But the real story is far more revealing: it's about protecting the alcohol ind...

Key differences Between Schedule I and Schedule III — What Rescheduling Marijuana Could Mean

  Key differences Between Schedule I and Schedule III — What Rescheduling Marijuana Could Mean Schedule I vs Schedule III Under the U.S. Controlled Substances Act (CSA), drugs are classified into schedules based on their accepted medical use, potential for abuse, and risk of dependence. Two key schedules in this context are Schedule I and Schedule III: Schedule I : Drugs with no currently accepted medical use in the U.S., a high potential for abuse , and potentially severe psychological or physical dependence. Examples include heroin, LSD, and currently, marijuana (cannabis). Schedule III : Drugs with accepted medical use , moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence, and a lower abuse risk compared to Schedules I or II. Examples include ketamine, anabolic steroids, testosterone, and certain codeine combinations (like Tylenol with codeine). Rescheduling marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III would formally recognize its medical benefits...

Free the Green: A Letter to President Donald J. Trump

  🇺🇸 Free the Green: A Letter to President Donald J. Trump An Open Plea from the American People & the Cannabis Family Legalize It President Trump, It’s time to Free the Green — to remove marijuana from the federal Schedule I classification, where it has been trapped since the Nixon era. A Law Without a Vote Few Americans realize that marijuana’s placement as a Schedule I drug — supposedly with “no medical value and a high potential for abuse” — was never voted on by Congress . It was assigned there in 1970 under the Controlled Substances Act by executive direction, intended as a temporary classification until a scientific commission could study the plant and make recommendations. That commission, known as the Shafer Commission , did complete its work — and in 1972, it recommended that marijuana should not be criminalized and should be removed from Schedule I entirely. The findings were ignored. Politics won. Science lost. And for over fifty years, that mi...